Well wholly by geezus I received a reply from our wonderful MP here in Edmonton.
Ottawa
February 22, 2008
Dear Mr. Blue,
Thank you for your correspondence regarding the racing industry and how it would be affected by a ban on the importation of leaded fuels.
While the government would prefer, in the long term, to see a transition from leaded fuels to unleaded fuels in the racing industry, the purpose of these amendments is not to force this transition. If you look at the amendments carefully, you will note that it is an amendment to extend the exemption that competitive automobiles receive for the importation of leaded fuel.
You should also note that it is part of a pattern of extending this exemption and that the government is fully aware of the consequences of not extending the exemption, quoted below from the document that you provided:
"Stakeholder feedback provided in 2007, supported by survey data, indicate that expiry of the competition vehicle exemption on January 1, 2008, is likely to result in the cancellation of racing events dependant on leaded gasoline, with concomitant direct and indirect impacts on revenue and employment. Some race tracks have already begun to organize and promote racing events for the 2008 season, including events featuring vehicles using leaded gasoline; it is therefore expected that the impact of expiry would be significant in the absence of an additional transition period."
It is unlikely that this situation will change in the near term and you can be assured that the government will be taking the racing industry’s views into account the next time these regulations come up for review.
Thank you again for taking the time to get in touch and share your views. Input from constituents is tremendously important to me, and I will be sure to keep your comments in mind.
Sincerely,
Laurie Hawn, MP
Edmonton Centre
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence
And then I replied back with...
Mr. Hawn
Thank you for taking the time to respond.
What still amazes me is why did this 1.5% ever become an issue in the first place? Are there not bigger fish in the sea to go after. This is a recreation that is enjoyed by many across this great country of ours, and brings recognition, and capital to many cities across this country, including ours. I would really hate to see this topic continually being debated over and over, using up your time, and our tax paying dollars, as well as to justify an environmental agents employment by standing at a local race track to sample the air quality.
I want my son, and my sons children, to be able to enjoy in their lives the spectacle of drag racing, as I enjoyed with my dad.
Is it really worth the effort for the 1.5%...
Trust me, no one will want to go see the hybrid races...
Regards,
Tony
"I Live More In 9 Seconds Doing The 1/4 Mile, Then Some People Live In Their Whole Lifetime"
Bookmarks